We live in an age where people are obsessed with numbers and metrics. The rise of 4K TVs quickly gave way to 8K, and 25 frames per second was replaced by 50, much to the delight of many cinematographers. Now, in the world of audio, 32-bit floating point recording has arrived, promising something new. But will it replace the long-standing 24-bit standard that professionals have relied on for years? I doubt it.

32-bit floating point audio is marketed as a "set it and forget it" tool, particularly for run-and-gun filmmakers who already juggle enough responsibilities—lighting, shot composition, directing talent. And yes, it’s pretty impressive at preventing audio distortion without constant adjustments. But here’s the thing: avoiding distortion isn’t the biggest challenge when it comes to capturing great sound.

The Real Challenge: It’s About Listening

Capturing high-quality audio is about more than numbers or bit depth—it’s about listening. It’s about understanding what will work in the edit, knowing what an editor can fix, and recognising when they’ll need to go again. It's about sensing and respecting the flow on set but also having the confidence to speak up when something isn’t right. It’s moving a rustling lav mic, catching background noise like a fridge hum during an interview, and reassuring the director, "We’ve got it. Don’t worry."

No piece of technology, not even 32-bit float, can replace the skill of active listening and making those on-the-fly decisions.

Is There a Place for 32-Bit Float?

In my experience, 32-bit float shines when the dynamic range is extreme and unpredictable—like recording cars or other high-energy sound sources. That’s when the extra headroom and data are worth it. But for most other situations, 24-bit audio has been and continues to be more than enough for professional needs.

‍